CONSIDERAÇÕES SOBRE O TEÍSMO CÉTICO

I argue in this paper that the so-called “skeptical theism” is not an adequate solution to the problem of evil. I start by showing that the two main steps of the argument for the skeptical theism are 1) the understanding of the Condition of Reasonable Epistemic Access (CORNEA) as a necessary condition for evidence and 2) the analogy between the relations God/Human Beings and Parents/Child. Then I argue that CORNEA is not a necessary condition for evidence and that the analogy stated fails or leads to a social version of the problem of evil.